Solve 4 Biggies
  ~  by reducing income taxes & increasing energy taxes

                          
   
New entries Wednesday &
Sunday evenings
  (& sometimes in between)

- Contribute to this online
  public conversation -





   1 - Global warming

   2 - Dependence on
        foreign energy

   3 - Trade deficit

   4 - Pollution from non-
        renewable fuels

32 years of oil left

Print the article

This entry was posted on 10/5/2008 10:44 PM and is filed under Gasoline,Global Peak Oil,Economy.

Gasoline prices are down, now what?

Many have stopped doing the things they were doing when gasoline was 50-75 cents/gallon higher.  You can be sure, that prices will go back up.  Why?  Peak oil.  My wish is that we had the foresight and leadership to recognize that a revenue-neutral tax shift would keep non-renewable prices high and provide a real incentive for all of us to conserve.  We'd also provide an incentive for businesses to create renewable energy systems.

Peak oil
Give or take a few years, most agree we'll reach the peak in five to ten years; some say we already have.  Here's an article from last month on CommodityOnline.com - it ain't pretty.  Peak Oil: America uses 21 million barrels per day  Excerpts:

    The peak comes when daily output can no longer be expanded and begins to shrink inexorably, year after year.  Best estimates are that the world started with two trillion barrels in the earth.  Best estimates are that one trillion remain.

    For perspective, the world today uses 85 million barrels per day.  That is 31 billion barrels per year.  At that rate, the one trillion barrels of estimated reserves would last 32 years until it was all gone.  But that is not the issue.  The problems start when daily production cannot meet daily demand.



Some will argue that it's really 60 years or 25 years; they're missing the point.  Either way, if we don't significantly curtail our oil use NOW, "we are dead meat" (to quote David Letterman).  From above, "The problems start when daily production cannot meet daily demand."

The sad part is that we know what the answers are:  conservation and developing renewable sources of energy.  What are we really doing about it?  Who's leading?  Let's turn "Big Oil" into "Big Energy" with a phased-in, federal tax shift from income to non-renewable energy.

We have such inertia to use huge amounts of fossil fuels; we need to continue turning this enormous ship around and price is the way to do it.       --> without paying more taxes (via a federal tax shift).

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

    • 11/5/2008 9:56 PM Jim Blair wrote:
      Hi,

      There is a big problem with the "peak oil" claim. Sure there will be a year when petroleum "production" (actually EXTRACTION) is its maximum, and will decline from that level. By the definition of "maximum"--duh.

      But the common misunderstanding is that the petroleum "production curve" will be Gaussian, i.e. symmetrical. Much more likely is that it will be highly skewed with a rapid rise to "peak" and then a gradual decline with most of the area (i.e. petroleum) being extracted long after the peak. (With many bumps in both the rise and the decline, but they are not important to this story)

      The reason being that the demand depends on the price. Early in the curve the easy to get petroleum is extracted--it often just gushes from the ground when a drill hits a deposit. So it is cheap. As the cheap oil is used up, the remaining is harder to find and more expensive to extract. Deeper, and in less accessible locations. Under the sea, in the arctic, under glaciers, far from shore, locked in shale formations, etc.

      As the cost of extracting rises, so will the price. So demand will drop with higher prices. Alternatives will become more attractive. This is the phase the world may now be entering.

      What the point of this little essay? That if climate change is to be taken seriously, we cannot wait for "peak oil" to reduce consumption. We won't "run out" of oil. We (the entire world) needs to tax oil--actually all sources of Green House Gas emissions to reduce using them long before we "run out" of oil, or natural gas, or coal. And (as you correctly say) rebate that tax back into the economy to avoid causing a depression. I say rebate it equally per capita within each country; some say equally on a world wide basis (which would mean mostly to the very poor of the world).

      Whatever the details, we can't afford to wait until the world "runs out" of fossil fuels. We better slow down our burning of them while there is still plenty remaining.
      Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.