Solve 4 Biggies
  ~  by reducing income taxes & increasing energy taxes

                          
   
New entries Wednesday &
Sunday evenings
  (& sometimes in between)

- Contribute to this online
  public conversation -





   1 - Global warming

   2 - Dependence on
        foreign energy

   3 - Trade deficit

   4 - Pollution from non-
        renewable fuels

350.org

Print the article

This entry was posted on 7/16/2008 10:21 PM and is filed under Tax Shifting,Global Warming.

A valiant, worldwide effort to reach agreement on the need to reduce atmospheric CO2 concentration below 350 ppm - www.350.org.  Per Bill McKibben on Truthout.org, late last year we were at 383 ppm

Once at the 350.org site, click on "About 350" to get the details.  Excerpts:

    "
350 is the red line for human beings, the most important number on the planet. The most recent science tells us that unless we can reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere to 350 parts per million, we will cause huge and irreversible damage to the earth.

OK, but how do we actually reduce carbon emissions to get to 350?
 
Make no mistake--getting back to 350 means transforming our world. It means building solar arrays instead of coal plants, it means planting trees instead of clear-cutting rainforests, it means increasing efficiency and decreasing our waste. Getting to 350 means developing a thousand different solutions--all of which will become much easier if we have a global treaty grounded in the latest science and built around the principles of equity and justice."


  ^^    ^^    ^^    ^^

Unfortunately, "building solar arrays instead of coal plants" and "increasing efficiency and decreasing our waste" won't happen without a real incentive.  What's needed is a phased-in, federal tax shift from income to non-renewable energy.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

    • 7/17/2008 9:52 AM Jim Blair wrote:
      Hi,

      www.350.org.

      Interesting link, but like so many other discussions of the issue I didn't see the "N" word even once. Like with the recent TIME and NEWSWEEK articles, and the CNN special, they can't even say, much less discuss it.

      Fields of solar collectors? Where we now grow food or have forests? To replace coal plants that generate electricity at night? Maybe around Phoenix, but in Wisconsin?
      Reply to this
    • 7/20/2008 9:01 PM Jim Blair wrote:
      Hi,

      Today I watched Al Gore on MEET THE PRESS. And the commercial break was T. Boone Pickens. 35 minutes of talk about Global Warming and ways to generate CO2 free energy, and not one mention of the "N" word.

      If I didn't already know that 20% of US electricity (and 80% in France) comes without CO2 emissions, I would not learn that from watching TV or reading the popular news magazines.
      Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.