Solve 4 Biggies
  ~  by reducing income taxes & increasing energy taxes

                          
   
New entries Wednesday &
Sunday evenings
  (& sometimes in between)

- Contribute to this online
  public conversation -





   1 - Global warming

   2 - Dependence on
        foreign energy

   3 - Trade deficit

   4 - Pollution from non-
        renewable fuels

The death spiral of global warming

Print the article

This entry was posted on 7/26/2007 6:24 AM and is filed under Global Warming.

Our global warming problem is bad and getting worse.  From the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on greenhouse gas levels -

     Pre-industrial levels of carbon dioxide (prior to the start of the Industrial Revolution) were about 280 parts per million by volume (ppmv), and current levels are about 370 ppmv. The concentration of CO2 in our atmosphere today, has not been exceeded in the last 420,000 years, and likely not in the last 20 million years.  ....... by the end of the 21st century, we could expect to see carbon dioxide concentrations of anywhere from 490 to 1260 ppm (75-350% above the pre-industrial concentration).

We're in a death spiral.

As the earth warms, human activities that cause the emission of greenhouse gases will accelerate.  This will create more warming, and so on, and so on......

Sound alarmist?  It is.  Do you think the families of the 35,000 Europeans that died in the 2003 heat wave are alarmed?  How about the families of the several hundred Californians that died in heat waves in July 2006?  Excerpt:

     - .... state officials reported that the two-week ordeal of triple-digit temperatures that began on July 14, 2006, killed 143 people.  But statistics compiled by the AP from each of California's 58 counties show the number of deaths last July was 466 higher than the average over the previous six years -- a spike many health officials attribute to the broiling heat.

The families of the "nearly 30" Europeans that died in heat waves last month?  Excerpts:
   
     - Temperatures reached 104 degrees in Athens on Friday, with a top recorded temperature of 113 degrees on the island of Rhodes....

     - Parts of Tirana have also suffered nine-hour power cuts this week, as hydroelectric reservoir levels remain low after a parched winter.

This reported yesterday - Europe heat wave faulted in 35 deaths.  Excerpts:

     - Some 870 people collapsed Monday from the heat and nearly 19,000 people contacted emergency services...

     - Temperatures in Macedonia also reached 107 degrees amid a declared national emergency.

     - Greek state services, including hospitals, remained on alert.  Athens was expected to reach 113 degrees today, with high humidity and air pollution levels.


Some examples of the downward spiral:

     - As temperatures rise, per-capita air-conditioning use increases.  In the U.S., air-conditioning is increasingly a mainstay of our lifestyles.  From an article on electricity supply and demand in the U.S., "...90 percent of all new homes in 2004 had central air conditioning vs. only 34 percent in 1970."  Do you think Europe is using more air conditioning these days?  Yes, Air conditioners 'provoking a power crisis in Hungary'

Here's an article by Stan Cox, Alternet - Air-conditioning: Our cross to bear on the many costs of A/C.

And, another A/C article by William Saletan on Slate; sobering with in-depth statistics - A/C D.C. - The deluded world of air-conditioning.

Some will counter that increased global temperatures also means less fossil fuel use for heating.  They are correct.  However, air-conditioning is significantly less efficient than heating so there will be a net increase in energy used and greenhouse gases emitted.

     - Climate change is causing additional drought and flooding.  Our response to wildfires caused by droughts includes sharply increased fossil fuel use - transport of personnel and helicopters dropping liquids to contain blazes.

Our response to floods is similar - emergency worker transport including helicopters and other aircraft, required because of the often life-and-death scenarios.

(Please comment with other examples of the death spiral of global warming.)

Next, these three facts:

   1) CO2 stays in the atmosphere for several hundred years.  Our grand children's grand children's grandchildren will feel the effects of our greenhouse gas emissions even if we stop emitting them tomorrow - the tremendous inertia of global warming.

   2) Reductions in air pollution will accelerate global warming because of global dimming.

   3) Developing countries, such as China, hold the potential to significantly increase their greenhouse gas emissions in the coming years and decades.  What is the U.S. (the world's largest per capita emitter of greenhouse gases) doing to lead the way to reduced greenhouse gas emissions by all?


In conclusion

We need to make meaningful policy shifts now to reduce greenhouse gas emissions if we are ever going to slow and stop the global warming "train."  Unfortunately, the train is still accelerating.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

    • 8/5/2007 11:05 AM Jim Blair wrote:
      Hi,

      That sure sounds bad.

      But the up side is that no matter how bad Global Warming may be, remember that it is better than replacing the coal power plants with nukes. After all, 2 Japanese actually DIED in a nuclear accident in 1999!!
      Reply to this
      1. 10/28/2007 10:26 PM Paul Riehemann wrote:

        It is bad.

        Another "death spiral" factor: 

        An excerpt from an article by Amy Goodman of "Democracy Now!" -

        "As forests burn, McKibben notes, carbon is released into the atmosphere.  Fewer trees then remain to take CO2 out of the atmosphere, making warmer conditions, supporting more and longer fires, and so on, creating a positive feedback loop. 

        A central warning point of the scientific community is this: At some point, if the Earth's temperature rises much more, maybe three degrees, maybe six degrees, an irreversible feedback loop will overwhelm the planet's climate, with cascading impacts leading to a warmer and warmer planet."


        Yes, very bad.

        Reply to this
    • 10/29/2007 7:48 AM Jim Blair wrote:
      Hi,

      Which is why I say that taking climate change seriously would mean not just a halt on new coal power plant construction (including those now being built), but also shutting down the existing ones as rapidly as they can be replaced.

      And that could be done only by a crash project to build new nuclear plants (in addition to wind farms, electric cars, and a shift to a GHG tax etc.)

      The technology for nuclear power exists today. We get 20% of our power from them, and can build new and better ones in about a year. But we do this only for new Navy ships.
      Reply to this
      1. 10/29/2007 7:58 PM Paul Riehemann wrote:

        Why not just make coal plants less economically viable than renewable energy by phasing-in a federal tax shift from income to non-renewable energy?  (including storage because, for example, the wind does not always blow and the sun does not always shine)

        This would happen gradually as the tax shift to recognize the ENORMOUS external costs of non-renewable energy was phased-in.  The U.S. would finally be leading the way on reducing greenhouse gases.

        Reply to this
    • 10/29/2007 10:25 AM Craig Jennings wrote:
      The Europeans and AC issue is skewed. In the 70's, most Europeans could not afford AC. It has not been until the last 10-20 years and the forming of the EU that many can or could afford luxury items available to more richer nations (note: USA)!

      Case in point: Southern Europe had very few cars, but now is overwhelmed with vehicles, causing many issues in every country (i.e.: London charging people to drive into central London, and other cities considering same) Cities are experiencing sprawl, which they accused the US of doing (and rightly so) and causing over use of fuels, but now, they are guilty of the same. They all want "the American Dream" they see in magazines and TV, the big house, the yard, the 2 car garage, plain and simple. I don't endorse this mentality, but, it is happening, not due to climate change.
      Reply to this
      1. 10/29/2007 8:09 PM Paul Riehemann wrote:

        Good info - thanks.

        Europeans are way ahead of us in terms of paying the external costs of non-renewable energy.  However, based on your comment, they too could use a tax shift to increase the price of non-renewable energy.  But - why should they??

        We need to lead the way, not be Neanderthals.  Policies that work toward equalized per capita greenhouse gas emissions is a good starting point.  (German Chancellor Merkel's idea, not mine)

        Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.