Solve 4 Biggies
  ~  by reducing income taxes & increasing energy taxes

                          
   
New entries Wednesday &
Sunday evenings
  (& sometimes in between)

- Contribute to this online
  public conversation -





   1 - Global warming

   2 - Dependence on
        foreign energy

   3 - Trade deficit

   4 - Pollution from non-
        renewable fuels

Global dimming

Print the article

This entry was posted on 6/11/2007 10:02 PM and is filed under uncategorized.

What is global dimming? - particulate matter in air pollution is reflecting energy from the sun away from the earth, cooling it.

According to a study published in the journal Nature and Cecil Adams author of the syndicated column The Straight Dope, every day global dimming is reducing the effects of global warming.  As a result, as we clean-up air pollution, global warming will accelerate.  Wonderful - huh?

Another reason we need tax shifting now.  Click here for the Nature article - (you need to be a paid subscriber for access).

***
Who is Cecil Adams? - he "can answer any question."  He certainly does his research and backs up statements with facts.  Excerpts from Cecil's column We know about global warming, but what about global dimming? below -

   "What concerns scientists is that over the past 50 years the average amount of sunlight hitting the earth's surface has markedly decreased, a phenomenon English scientist Gerry Stanhill dubbed global dimming in 2001."

   "Examples from history abound, one of the most dramatic being the eruption of Indonesia's Mount Tambora in 1815. The powerful blast took off the top mile of the mountain, killed tens of thousands of people, and released so much sulfur and ash into the air that 1816 was known as the "year without a summer." Crop failures, famine, bitter winter cold and record snows, and a strange dry summer fog made 1816 a bad year for most of North America and Europe -- New England got heavy snowfall in June and Virginia allegedly had frost on the Fourth of July."

   "Pollutants released at ground level may not be the only contributor to global dimming. A 2002 study published in Nature analyzed the impact of the reduction of jet contrails after the mass grounding of U.S. flights following the 9/11 attacks. Reviewing weather data from some 4,000 reporting stations, researchers found temperatures from September 11 to 14, 2001 were two degrees higher than the 30-year average, and three degrees higher than during the three-day periods before and after the grounding."

   "The good news is that global dimming seems to be reversing itself, mainly because we've been cleaning up the environment. Measurements show that since 1990 or so, more sunlight has been reaching the earth's surface, with about a 4 percent increase in the last decade. The bad news is that, because dimming threw off the measurements, global warming may have been underestimated and projections of long-term temperature increases may be too low. This has provoked at least one brainiac to propose an antiwarming strategy using artificial volcanoes to send clouds of sulfur into the air."

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

    • 6/12/2007 7:41 AM Mark Jeantheau wrote:
      Yep, this is a real problem, a classic instance of being "between rock and a hard place." Breathe dirtier air or cook to death.

      Air pollution causes all manner of environmental problems, respiratory disease, and general ill health, but the fact that we have spewed all those particulates into the air at the same time we were spewing the greenhouse gases has delayed the manifestation of global warming, which is a much worse problem in the long run. Polluters will no doubt use this as an argument for slowing down progress on improving air-pollution controls---coincidentally fattening their bottom lines---but the correct solutions is to continue reducing air pollution at the same time we implement a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. We know how to do both---if we only have the willpower.
      Reply to this
      1. 6/14/2007 10:35 PM Paul Riehemann wrote:

        On the mark, we DO know how to do both.

        We need to reduce air pollution (period).  We've just had a couple of air quality watches in Madison, Wisconsin including today.  Not much fun as I'm riding my bike home from work in the ozone "soup."  I wonder - exercise is of course good for me, but is riding on a day like this a net gain or loss for my health?  (there's a motivator to encourage people to consider biking or walking to work)

        The existence of global dimming requires all (the world) to be VERY aggressive in our actions to reduce greenhouse gases.

        Willpower is a key -- ideas from readers on how to increase willpower in the U.S. to act??


        Reply to this
        1. 7/4/2007 12:02 PM Jim Blair wrote:
          Hi,

          The dimming effect is real and means (to me) that it is stupid to spend billions of dollars to "clean up" existing coal power plants (as many want to do) when that would make Global Warming worse, and if we ever get serious about climate change those "clean" coal plants would need to be shut down anyway.

          And wind is not much of an option in places where the wind is not reliable.
          Unless you want hundreds (thousands?) of miles of new transmissions lines to import wind power from Nebraska or the Dakotas to Wisconsin. Remember Arrowhead or the current opposition to just one power line on the Madison beltline?
          Reply to this
          1. 7/7/2007 11:24 PM Paul Riehemann wrote:
            Jim,

            Nothing like a good joust - thanks for commenting.



            We need to clean-up coal.  Reality is that there is a lot of it and it will be burned.  Here's a link to the EPA site on the health hazards of particulate matter (PM).  Excerpt -

                 Particle pollution - especially fine particles - contains microscopic solids or liquid droplets that are so small that they can get deep into the lungs and cause serious health problems. Numerous scientific studies have linked particle pollution exposure to a variety of problems, including:

            • increased respiratory symptoms, such as irritation of the airways, coughing, or difficulty breathing, for example;
            • decreased lung function;
            • aggravated asthma;
            • development of chronic bronchitis;
            • irregular heartbeat;
            • nonfatal heart attacks; and
            • premature death in people with heart or lung disease. 

            The question is, how much to clean it up?

            The first step toward reducing coal use is to start making electricity and heat from coal more expensive relative to renewable energy sources.  This will significantly reduce greenhouse gases.

            My reply to your second paragraph -- phase-in a reduction in federal income taxes and increase non-renewable energy prices by creating a BTU tax.  Then, let the market decide.

            The dimming effect is real, but to solve global warming I'd rather we shift taxes instead of literally killing ourselves.


            Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.