Solve 4 Biggies
  ~  by reducing income taxes & increasing energy taxes

                          
   
New entries Wednesday &
Sunday evenings
  (& sometimes in between)

- Contribute to this online
  public conversation -





   1 - Global warming

   2 - Dependence on
        foreign energy

   3 - Trade deficit

   4 - Pollution from non-
        renewable fuels

Tragedy of the Commons and WIIFM

Print the article

This entry was posted on 5/26/2007 11:02 PM and is filed under Action.



From a recent letter to the editor in response to a Wisconsin State Journal question: What, if anything, should be done about the high cost of gasoline?

"I am from the WWII generation and we had gas rationing, which included a sticker for the windshield asking 'Is this trip necessary?' .....While we as a nation go about our own merry way, our troops are 'over there' putting their lives on the line so we at home can complain about gas prices and do nothing about conserving it."       Florence Park, Waterloo

Go Florence.

The fact is, however, that times have changed and personal sacrifice for altruistic reasons doesn't happen as often.  Our country's motto could be, "WIIFM" (What's in it for me?)  It's always been there and it's not all bad; it's called capitalism.  My view is that WIIFM has gotten much bigger in the last 20-30 years.  We could debate if this is true; if it is, why it's happened and so on.  But this won't help us solve BIG problems we face such as global warming and our dependence on foreign sources of energy (how strong is our addiction to oil?  3,454 U.S. soldiers have now died in Iraq.)

We're a pretty pragmatic bunch and that's why a solution with shared pain and benefit is called for.  Google "Tragedy of the Commons."  Who's going to be the first 50% to pull their cows from grazing in the commons?  We'll never make it that far without an agreement up front that we're going to change the rules for all, for the long-term benefit of all.

Congress should cut federal income taxes and raise taxes on non-renewable energy to replace the revenue.  This tax shift should be phased-in over 10 years. Higher non-renewable energy prices will reduce our energy use and stimulate the U.S. alternative energy industry.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

    • 5/28/2007 7:41 AM Mark Jeantheau wrote:
      To some extent, the lack of interest in altruistic acts today is blowback from the 1960s and early 1970s. There were a lot of good ideas to come out of the hippie-peace-free-love-fairness-antiestablishment movement, but there were a lot of excesses too.

      At some point people got sick of the turbulence of the '60s and '70s and, in the 1980s, the plutocratic establishment began to regain control of the "chaos." The "dirty drug culture" of that era was replaced with the glitzy era of cocaine and other trendy, chic drugs. The draft went away and military options started flying mostly beneath the radar. Reagan's fawning happy-talk ("It's morning in America") replaced serious political speech, and right-wing radio began its rise to power with it's blame-game, uber-capitalist propaganda, largely designed to replace service-based behavior with for-profit behavior. (Corporations have a hard time profiting if people are doing things for free.)

      Clinton tried briefly to reinvigorate public service with a new program, but the trend was already in full swing the other way, and he was too tied to Big Money to worry much about it. Now we have Bush Jr's approach of "we're at war; go shopping" and Cheney's me-oriented assurances that "The American way of life is not negotiable" and conservation "is not the basis of a sound energy policy."

      So, it basically comes down to bad parenting by our leaders. Americans act like spoiled six-year-olds who want more toys (bigger houses and cars, more gas, better TVs), don't care that their room (planet) is a mess, and stubbornly refuse to tend to their studies (learn anything about how modern society really works, vote, participate in local civics).

      Not all US citizens are like this, of course, but in my experience, most are. It's doesn't make them bad people---most of them are very nice, very pleasant. It just makes them unevolved.
      Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.